BuffBeauty

[e_honda]

FWIW, she took the communication thru OF only requirement out of her profile. Says she's having surgery and can only do in person sessions in her area after she's recovered in spring. I haven't bothered e-mailing her, so maybe it's still an automated message telling you to subscribe to her OF page, but just an observation that her SG profile no longer has that.

I don't know if this ultimately means anything as far as someone actually booking a session with her, but I'm guessing that OF requirement wasn't doing much in her favor.

[e_honda]

⚡ Support Saradas

Keep the archive alive with Bitcoin

1QDxcxUx8pnsZvauyVxTqaJrWkeNhQrPdK

Donate →

[abracadabra]

She probably would have been better off waiting 6 months to make her profile. The novelty effect is real, and all this weird stuff probably means some of the guys will just no longer be interested.

[hwillish]

Just reading this reminds me of my new vow to probably wait at least a few months if I were interested is seeing someone who was new.  Have a few "friends" who I try to see on a regular basis when they are in my "neck of the woods", but took a chance on one "newbie" earlier this year.  I happened to be in a city about 60 miles from her and thought what they hell...so I suggested she come to me and thus paid her a "premium" to do so  

She did so and while having lunch after our session she informed me she was getting some surgery done in the next two weeks and then was then going to get married  

Dropped out of site and that was it...never to be seen again 

[hwillish]

Just remembered, I recently met with one of my favorite must see ladies and told her about my experience...aparantly she had done a video with this same girl and said it was one of the worst experiences SHE had ever had as well.  It was with one of the major production companies and they've never released the video to her knowledge!!!!

[boyofwinter]

Actually had a good email experience with her, advised me I might want to wait because of this issue she's taking care of, she could've done the opposite.

Just reading this reminds me of my new vow to probably wait at least a few months if I were interested is seeing someone who was new.

out of site and that was it...never to be seen again 

So this was a bad session? That part seemed unclear.
But if I hadn't jumped once spotting a new profile and being conveniently in position to meet the lady in question I would've missed out on at least 3 of my top 20 sessions. There's no fast rule for this stuff.

[boyofwinter]

She's traveling, nyc in 2 weeks.

[FemFlexUSA]

I can't imagine the admin on SG would see this in a good light, either. Maybe they don't care, who knows.

So now you want them to monitor what individual girls also put on their OnlyFans pages?

You people have ridiculous expectations of SG admin.

[e_honda]

So now you want them to monitor what individual girls also put on their OnlyFans pages?

You people have ridiculous expectations of SG admin.

Reading comprehension, dude. Nowhere did I say SG admin should go to her OF page and monitor what she puts there. Why would they?

I merely said they might be less than enthused that their site's intended service was basically being used as leverage to funnel more people to her paid subscriptions on OF. And I emphasize intended service. Obviously, many women on SG have links to their OFs, C4S and other sites, but she was the only one requiring an OF subscription to even ask about a session.

Regardless, she's taken that requirement down. Either SG admin told her to or she found out it wasn't doing her any good. Either way, it was a ridiculous proposition proposition that was potentially unreliable.