Do you prefer female bodybuilders with implants or pre implants

[FbbLegends]

Ive come to realize i personally prefer a natural chest for the women. Even if they are all pecs, I see that as beautiful and feminine too. Women dont have to look one way to be feminine or attractive.

Id say my diplomatic answer is these women can look however they chose to. If they want implants more power to them. It's their bodies. But as far as what I personally find appealing, I like seeing how many women now dont have implants actually. I think its encouraging and a good thing. Far as I can tell the top fbbs right now are rocking natural chests. Shaw, Yeo and Lynette Jones. And theyre all gorgeous women without question.

[FbbLegends]

⚡ Support Saradas

Keep the archive alive with Bitcoin

1QDxcxUx8pnsZvauyVxTqaJrWkeNhQrPdK

Donate →

[Zenzen]

For me, it really depends on the individual athlete and how well everything fits together aesthetically.

There are some competitors whose earlier, pre-implant physiques had a very natural and balanced look that I prefer. In some cases, the proportions seemed to flow better, especially when the focus was entirely on the muscular development.

On the other hand, there are athletes whose stage presentation improved after turning pro and making changes to meet the expectations of the era. In those cases, the implants became part of the overall package and didn't seem out of place.

It's also worth remembering that judging standards and industry expectations have changed over the years. For a long time, many female bodybuilders felt pressure to maintain a traditionally feminine appearance while carrying a significant amount of muscle, and implants became fairly common for that reason.

So if I had to chose, I'd say I don't have a blanket preference for "pre-implant" or "post-implant." I usually judge each athlete individually based on overall balance, proportions, and how the physique comes together as a whole.

I'm curious whether others have a strong preference one way or the other, or if they're in the "depends on the athlete" camp as well.

[Nahuel-H]

I think I am also in the "it depends on the athlete" camp.

Personally, I usually have a special appreciation for the pre-implant look, especially in female bodybuilding, because it often feels more natural, more athletic, and more focused on the muscle itself. In many classic physiques, the chest, shoulders, back, waist, and overall structure seemed to flow in a very organic way. There was something very pure about that look.

But at the same time, I understand why many athletes chose implants. Female bodybuilders have always had to deal with a difficult contradiction: they were expected to build extreme muscle, but also remain visually "feminine" according to the standards of the industry and the audience. That pressure was real, especially in certain eras.

So I don't think it is fair to judge the athlete harshly for that choice. In some cases, implants can fit the overall presentation very well. In other cases, I personally feel the previous physique looked more balanced.

For me, the most important thing is harmony. If the physique still looks powerful, balanced, confident, and true to the athlete's identity, then it can work either way.

But if I speak from my own taste, I usually lean slightly toward the pre-implant look because I love the raw, athletic, natural bodybuilding aesthetic — where the muscle, structure, conditioning, and presence are the main focus.





Creo que yo también estoy en el grupo de "depende de la atleta".

Personalmente, suelo apreciar mucho el aspecto preimplantes, especialmente en el culturismo femenino, porque muchas veces se siente más natural, más atlético y más centrado en el músculo en sí. En muchos físicos clásicos, el pecho, los hombros, la espalda, la cintura y la estructura general parecían fluir de una manera muy orgánica. Había algo muy puro en esa estética.

Pero al mismo tiempo, entiendo por qué muchas atletas eligieron colocarse implantes. Las culturistas femeninas siempre tuvieron que cargar con una contradicción difícil: se les pedía desarrollar una musculatura extrema, pero al mismo tiempo conservar una imagen "femenina" según los estándares de la industria y del público. Esa presión fue real, especialmente en ciertas épocas.

Por eso no me parece justo juzgar duramente a una atleta por esa decisión. En algunos casos, los implantes encajan muy bien con la presentación general. En otros casos, personalmente siento que el físico anterior se veía más equilibrado.

Para mí, lo más importante es la armonía. Si el físico sigue viéndose poderoso, equilibrado, seguro y fiel a la identidad de la atleta, puede funcionar de cualquiera de las dos formas.

Pero si hablo desde mi gusto personal, suelo inclinarme un poco más por el aspecto preimplantes, porque amo esa estética cruda, atlética y natural del culturismo: donde el músculo, la estructura, la condición y la presencia son el centro absoluto.

[FbbLegends]

Glad to see im with the two-thirds that appreciate a natural chest. I heard once that some women got them to trade off for having to train pecs. If thats true, idk, but might as well be bc it basically covers up what youd get from a side chest.

Some women got them and theyre small enough, sit low enough that it looks like a natural hang from their chest. Most get these half grapefruit ones and they look awful TO ME but hey, all these women are awesome to me for their dedication so I respect then regardless

[KennyL97]

I personally prefer pre implants in female bodybuilders. This shows the true "package" put together through dedication, hard work, diet, sacrifice, and commitment in developing and presenting the well-defined muscle groups attractively and with confident femininity.

[michaelg1978]

Honestly? I could go either way. I love big boobs but if a female bodybuilder stays natural I find that attractive too. I guess it's subjective

[knufflschmoe]

Mostly with implants is more appealing to me...!
....since combo of muscle & tits is very sexy....but if the package  is perfect otherwise ,it can be atractive also without... ( so as by " Amazona Fit"- IsaRuizBaena), but not exagerated( such as by Barbara Carita)