Forum Saradas

Female BodyBuilding & Fitness & Figure - Members Area => Tastes and opinions of Saradas members => Topic started by: csll on September 04, 2017, 05:45:47 am

Title: Scope of your Fetish
Post by: csll on September 04, 2017, 05:45:47 am
I'm interested in learning about the extent of people's muscle fetish - whether it's limited to strictly women, if it's tied to a specific activity (lift and carry, domination, etc), if it's a desire you have for yourself - a sort of sexual profile.

Personally, I was attracted to strength and muscularity in general since I can remember. In a superhero sort of way, I imagined myself growing to become ultra muscular and was drawn to both the visual and perceived feeling of it. As a child, I never thought about muscularity in terms of gender, but rather like a state of being that either men or women could be in (had no idea what it took to get there). When I hit puberty, that state of being took on a sexual connotation - almost like a nakedness, and I've since come to think of bodybuilding, flexing, and muscle worship like a mating call. I was and continue to be attracted to "classical" feminine beauty, but there's an androgynous desire for muscularity overlaying it, and they combine to make female bodybuilders my ideal of beauty. Simultaneously, I can get aroused from my own muscularity or imagining myself to be very muscular - I'm not at all at bodybuilder level, but in decent shape. There is an attraction to muscular men and a little to men in general, though to a lessor degree, as if it were a byproduct of the general fetish.

The elephant in the room which we all know too well - that muscularity is inherently a male trait - has always made it very confusing none the less. There's clear phallic aspect to pumped up muscles on men or women, and I've always wondered if somewhere at the core of my fetish is a reference to what arousal looks and feels like within my own body. Something like Arnold's famous line from Pumping Iron, that the feeling of a pump feels the same as cumming. From this perspective, I see bodybuilding as a pursuit of a constant state of arousal. In a partner, I don't really have a submissive energy attached to it, but rather a search for mutual dominance and power that feed each other. It's not quite this explicit, but at some level I see a female bodybuilder like the ultimate alpha woman to be conquered, and (in my fantasies) she not only knows this, but looks at me the same way.
Title: Re: Scope of your Fetish
Post by: Ozzyfm on September 04, 2017, 12:46:51 pm
Intersting subject, indeed.

As many of other guys I suppose, my interest in muscles started with women. But if i remember correctly, when I discovered my love for muscles, I also used to love muscles in any form, on men or picturing myself with huge ones.

Later, I found that I what I truly loved was huuuuge muscles, on women, but also on men.

Now, I'm just dying for any kind of huuuge, manly muscles!
Title: Re: Scope of your Fetish
Post by: FemFlexUSA on September 04, 2017, 05:49:06 pm
The elephant in the room which we all know too well - that muscularity is inherently a male trait ...

Thirty years ago, I may have agreed with you, but having so much more data to work with now, I disagree.  Muscle - even "hypermuscularity" - does not know gender. It is completely gender-neutral.  It responds to work and hormones and while the middle 50% of males (in terms of strength) are almost always going to be "stronger" than the middle 50% of females, there is a significant percentage of adult females who are stronger than many adult males of around the same age. 

If you wish to ascribe masculinity or femininity to a certain volume of muscle, you may, but I think it's beneficial to recognize that there exists a large number of females who are predisposed to (being able to build) a higher level of muscle development than some of their male counterparts. 
Title: Re: Scope of your Fetish
Post by: 20thcenturyboy on September 04, 2017, 11:03:24 pm
I'd say my scope skews toward female, but it's very broad. Maybe 70% female and 30% male. I have days where I'm more attracted to one or the other, and it's definitely an attraction almost solely to muscle. So muscle is the fetish first and foremost, then gender follows. I get turned off seeing most male bodybuilder faces, but their bodies make me go wild. An attractive female face on a muscular body drives me even more wild. So yeah, with me it's not so cut and dry.

Cool topic!
Title: Re: Scope of your Fetish
Post by: 87fg on September 04, 2017, 11:16:28 pm
I would say I do like see women using their muscles and demonstrating their strength. The common posing videos can only be so interesting for so long. When I started watching mixed wrestling videos, it was amazing to me see their physical prowess in action. You can have muscles, but may not be very strong just sculpted. Women doing feats of strength is a turn on. Power is attractive and in this case physical power can be a positive attribute for women. It's just society sees it as taboo, but that only makes it more desirable.
Title: Re: Scope of your Fetish
Post by: bf5waea97 on September 05, 2017, 01:30:07 am
This is probably the best post to ever see on here. I definitely like a muscular male body, but I've hooked up done stuff with muscular men and it didn't do anything for me but with muscular women it was really great. It's always made me super confused. I just really liked muscle but I also like the female aesthetic. 
Title: Re: Scope of your Fetish
Post by: GAP on September 05, 2017, 01:54:44 am
The elephant in the room which we all know too well - that muscularity is inherently a male trait ...

Thirty years ago, I may have agreed with you, but having so much more data to work with now, I disagree.  Muscle - even "hypermuscularity" - does not know gender. It is completely gender-neutral.  It responds to work and hormones and while the middle 50% of males (in terms of strength) are almost always going to be "stronger" than the middle 50% of females, there is a significant percentage of adult females who are stronger than many adult males of around the same age. 

If you wish to ascribe masculinity or femininity to a certain volume of muscle, you may, but I think it's beneficial to recognize that there exists a large number of females who are predisposed to (being able to build) a higher level of muscle development than some of their male counterparts. 

I had never thought of that. Me personally, I enjoy muscle on females although I do have my limits and I am bascially attracted to the muscle and power that they display. My scope is usually towards anyone but mostly female who demonstrate muscle and strength.
Title: Re: Scope of your Fetish
Post by: NinjaStar on September 05, 2017, 02:44:34 pm
I've never gotten excited from a female bodybuilder for being 'masculine.' Virilization from steroids is actually a turn off for me. I like pecs over tits on a female bodybuilder because I hate breast implants, and I like mass. There really isn't much more to it.
Title: Re: Scope of your Fetish
Post by: Username13 on September 05, 2017, 06:53:13 pm
I think it mostly boils down to the domination aspect of it. I find muscle on a woman very attractive aesthetically, but am also very much into strength, muscle talk, lift and carry, etc. I also find it a pretty big turn on if a woman can overpower me, or other men. I can't pretend to understand the scope of it entirely, but there's some type of mix of the taboo nature of it all, along with the role reversal aspect of it. This is something that doesn't extend to men for me. I do like trans girls though, which may be/probably is somehow related to the muscle fetish as well. Those girls don't have to be muscular, but if they are... goddamn.
Title: Re: Scope of your Fetish
Post by: Goremaul on September 05, 2017, 07:02:14 pm
I'm more partial to fitness models / competitors, gymnasts, swimmers, and FBBs that have that "Golden Age" aesthetic. I've never been a fan of those "ladies" who clearly have been shaving, have stronger jaws than Kirk Douglas, and have 'roid guts.
Title: Re: Scope of your Fetish
Post by: cmk201 on September 08, 2017, 04:42:28 pm
So for me it started with being maybe seven or eight and coming across a female bodybuilding contest on tv.  I did not realize at the time what I was feeling, but now I know I was turned on by the women posing.  So at first it was only about muscular women, but then I started to realize I like male bodybuilders too.  I just love a musclebound body, whether it be a woman or a man.  I like women of all levels of fitness, from bikini to the most extreme bodybuilders.  I am not normally attracted to female bodybuilders who have the faces of men.  I still want them to look like women, even if their level of muscularity is that of a male bodybuilder.  And like 20thcenturyboy said, I don't like seeing male bodybuilder faces, I just like their bodies.  I have never found myself attracted to men who weren't full fledged bodybuilders.  I guess there are a few of the physique models that I like, but it's because the are on the more muscular side of physique.  So I would say its the muscle that turns me on.  Now I will admit, that even though I am not attracted to non bodybuilder men, I do get off on seeing a bodybuilder with a large bulge in his posers.  Packed posers always get me going, but I wouldn't want to see a regular guy with the same.  Does nothing for me.  So who knows.

I also like regular women.  I've dated girls who were really fit, and I've dated a few that were thicker and been equally attracted to them.  But nothing does it for me like muscle.  There are days I lean more towards male bodybuilders, but if I had my choice, it would be female bodybuilders.
Title: Re: Scope of your Fetish
Post by: cmk201 on September 08, 2017, 04:45:51 pm
So for me it started with being maybe seven or eight and coming across a female bodybuilding contest on tv.  I did not realize at the time what I was feeling, but now I know I was turned on by the women posing.  So at first it was only about muscular women, but then I started to realize I like male bodybuilders too.  I just love a musclebound body, whether it be a woman or a man.  I like women of all levels of fitness, from bikini to the most extreme bodybuilders.  I am not normally attracted to female bodybuilders who have the faces of men.  I still want them to look like women, even if their level of muscularity is that of a male bodybuilder.  And like 20thcenturyboy said, I don't like seeing male bodybuilder faces, I just like their bodies.  I have never found myself attracted to men who weren't full fledged bodybuilders.  I guess there are a few of the physique models that I like, but it's because the are on the more muscular side of physique.  So I would say its the muscle that turns me on.  Now I will admit, that even though I am not attracted to non bodybuilder men, I do get off on seeing a bodybuilder with a large bulge in his posers.  Packed posers always get me going, but I wouldn't want to see a regular guy with the same.  Does nothing for me.  So who knows.

I also like regular women.  I've dated girls who were really fit, and I've dated a few that were thicker and been equally attracted to them.  But nothing does it for me like muscle.  There are days I lean more towards male bodybuilders, but if I had my choice, it would be female bodybuilders.

And I should add, I prefer contest condition over off-season.  I was surprised when I found this forum how many people prefer the off season.  For me it was always the ripped, striated look that I got off to most.  When if comes to off season, I definitely prefer women over men.  I only want to see male bodybuilders ripped and ready for a contest.  Women, I'll take either way, but really prefer the contest conditioning.
Title: Re: Scope of your Fetish
Post by: LuvsFitChicks on September 08, 2017, 08:10:26 pm
I love all types of muscular women! All classes that compete in shows draw my attention front and center lol.

As for fetish I like muscle worship, domination, posing, clothes shredding, muscular women catfighting, the wet look, stage tan, girl on girl and tight fitted clothing on a FBB
Title: Re: Scope of your Fetish
Post by: 20thcenturyboy on September 08, 2017, 11:05:29 pm
So for me it started with being maybe seven or eight and coming across a female bodybuilding contest on tv.  I did not realize at the time what I was feeling, but now I know I was turned on by the women posing.  So at first it was only about muscular women, but then I started to realize I like male bodybuilders too.  I just love a musclebound body, whether it be a woman or a man.  I like women of all levels of fitness, from bikini to the most extreme bodybuilders.  I am not normally attracted to female bodybuilders who have the faces of men.  I still want them to look like women, even if their level of muscularity is that of a male bodybuilder.  And like 20thcenturyboy said, I don't like seeing male bodybuilder faces, I just like their bodies.  I have never found myself attracted to men who weren't full fledged bodybuilders.  I guess there are a few of the physique models that I like, but it's because the are on the more muscular side of physique.  So I would say its the muscle that turns me on.  Now I will admit, that even though I am not attracted to non bodybuilder men, I do get off on seeing a bodybuilder with a large bulge in his posers.  Packed posers always get me going, but I wouldn't want to see a regular guy with the same.  Does nothing for me.  So who knows.

I also like regular women.  I've dated girls who were really fit, and I've dated a few that were thicker and been equally attracted to them.  But nothing does it for me like muscle.  There are days I lean more towards male bodybuilders, but if I had my choice, it would be female bodybuilders.

And I should add, I prefer contest condition over off-season.  I was surprised when I found this forum how many people prefer the off season.  For me it was always the ripped, striated look that I got off to most.  When if comes to off season, I definitely prefer women over men.  I only want to see male bodybuilders ripped and ready for a contest.  Women, I'll take either way, but really prefer the contest conditioning.

Totally the same here! I love the ripped vascular look, seeing muscle separation and fibers twitching gets me going way more than the softer off-season look. Although as long as there's muscle, I'm game.
Title: Re: Scope of your Fetish
Post by: OldSchmoe67 on September 08, 2017, 11:31:32 pm
I'll say this:

Recently I was partying with a group of old friends, and have no real filter between us. Included in the company was one of their wives. We were generally f**king around, joking as usual and into "no homo" mode, which is just a mock bizarre/gay/ridiculousness bit, usually with pretty graphic, often disgustingly funny jokes, and carrying on, laughing hysterically.

(No one present is actually gay, but it wouldn't matter if we were. No homophobes in the bunch. I'm sure someone out there knows what I mean.)

My buddy's wife, who is no prude but is unaccustomed to spending time with the group as a whole, sat there agape, then blurted “You guys are so f**king gay!” which caused even more laughter.

I said, “Hon, gay? Gay isn't nearly weird enough for my kind of weird!” and we carried on.
Title: Re: Scope of your Fetish
Post by: mooretiger on September 09, 2017, 01:45:25 am
hard to ever explain what somebody likes.
I have 2 very physical jobs with all male co-workers. those are men I work with.... I see pics of male bodybuilders , they look like silly oiled up sissies......nothing but for- show muscles. doesn't do ANYTHING for me.I see a developed fbb , a big turn on. hard to explain.
Title: Re: Scope of your Fetish
Post by: honduras97 on September 09, 2017, 07:24:48 pm
I don't ever remember getting aroused by muscular men (or any men for that matter). On the other hand, I remember vididly having sexual fantasies about women stronger and more muscular than myself at a very young age. For me, it has always boiled down to femdom aspect of it, at least to some degree. I don't usually get turned on by "normal" looking girls, although if I know that a girl is physically capable (say a highly skilled MMA fighter) of overpowering me, then I don't really care if she has visible muscle or not (it is a plus however).

That being said, even if I have been attracted to some very large women who have obiously been on PEDS with signs of virilization clearly visible, they still have to maintain a level of femininity where it's clear that they are indeed women. I don't consider myself a homophobe of any sort, but my fetish has been limited exclusively to women for as long as I've had it. And sometimes I wonder if life would be better without having it, as it tends to impose some hard limits on my dating life, at least if I want to meet women I'm genuinely attracted to.
Title: Re: Scope of your Fetish
Post by: pakeha on September 10, 2017, 02:36:22 pm
This thread has been intriguing and surprising for me - surprising in that I didn't realize how many schmoes had an attraction to male muscle as well as female muscle. Interesting that 'so many' (albeit a small number responding so far) are gender-agnostic muscle fetishists.

The genesis of my kink was my aunt and her thick arms, so for as long as I can remember, women and strength have been hard-wired into my brain. It developed through into my teens with random things like a girl beating-up a guy at school, martina navratalova's arms, muscle & fitness mag and discovering laura coombes, bev francis, claudia wilbourn etc etc... then into WPW... and of course into the world of sessions.

To describe the attraction female muscle has for me, firstly the aesthetic of muscle is in itself, a massive turn-on - if I spot the thickness of a delt or the pop of a vein on a woman from a mile away, I'm instantly stimulated. However that look triggers a deeper psycho-sexual association with being controlled... having my power taken away from me... being totally emasculated by, what society stereotypes as the 'weaker sex'. Having a woman very visibly challenge those preconceptions, and be confident enough to own a supposedly male attribute of hyper-muscularity, is amazing. There's nowhere for a fbb to hide - whatever she does and wherever she goes, her life choice of being muscular is there for all to see, and... she doesn't care about people's negative opinions.

When I'm in the presence of a muscle woman, electricity runs through my body. In a session, she's not being apologetic for what she has achieved - she stands before me and openly and proudly flexes. Her face and her actions say - I have muscle... I'm 10x stronger than you... and here I am - look at my muscle, look how thick it is... and tell me how powerful and dominant I am.

When a fbb then crosses the line from muscle to sexuality, my worlds collide and I'm in heaven :)
Title: Re: Scope of your Fetish
Post by: 87fg on September 10, 2017, 02:47:01 pm
The idea of a living sculpture I believe is what attracts men to a muscular woman. It does accentuate the female form mostly the lower body. 
Title: Re: Scope of your Fetish
Post by: I like strong women on September 11, 2017, 05:40:29 pm
always been attracted to physically strong women- the concept that a woman could be stronger- able to force herself upon me- is one of the things that attracted me. so bodybuilding is incidental- acrobats, gymnasts, athletic women, big strong women are the erotic symbol for me.
Title: Re: Scope of your Fetish
Post by: outmuscled on September 13, 2017, 01:14:45 am
I also find it a pretty big turn on if a woman can overpower me, or other men. I can't pretend to understand the scope of it entirely, but there's some type of mix of the taboo nature of it all, along with the role reversal aspect of it.

I think it's this, the role reversal. It's the erotic surprise of a woman who can beat the men at their own game of strength and muscularity and make you want to cede the role of master to her in a completely authentic way, not as some false sub/dom fantasy role play.
With the really developed bodybuilders, it's as if the sight of those swollen erect muscles almost cuckolds you out of your own masculinity.

I prefer muscle but all types of female strength turns me on, so I do notice some big hefty women as well, namely the ones who are pretty solid rather than wobbly fat and who outweigh me by 40 pounds, since I reckon that's the point at which my male muscular advantage is cancelled out.
In fact, my only defeat to a woman has come at the hands of this type of physique (alas she was embarassed by her power and stopped playing when she realised she genuinely had the upper hand) while I've grappled a few weight trained women (but nothing like bodybuilders) and won pretty easily.
(obviously big heavy women are not without muscle either, it's just a case of it being hidden under the body fat - in fact they can carry a lot of muscle in their core).

It's the muscles that really do it for me though from an aesthetic point of view. The thrill of being faced with a woman with a stunning physique, who's harder than me, broader than me, with bigger muscles and makes me feel like the soft, weak one (which I'm actually not).
It's strictly limited to women but I'm fine with a butch look and some virilising effects like the deeper voice (in fact that's a turn on, as it shows she's pushed the boundaries and makes her seem more alpha) and not others like thinning hair or enlarged jaws.

The urge I have with such women is to both test and feel their strength, so wrestling, lift and carry, mutual bearhugs
It has to be gentle despite the competitive aspects of wrestling. No beatdowns or cruel dommes. I guess I just want to be squeezed!

For me the taboo is not female muscle (which I think is more accepted now) but the role reversal, and the physical surrender of a man to woman, which even a lot of strong women are not comfortable with. It threatens their feminity just as much as your masculinity. It takes a mentally strong woman to handle being physically stronger and want to explore those dynamics.
Title: Re: Scope of your Fetish
Post by: GAP on September 14, 2017, 03:50:54 am
Quote
For me the taboo is not female muscle (which I think is more accepted now) but the role reversal, and the physical surrender of a man to woman, which even a lot of strong women are not comfortable with. It threatens their feminity just as much as your masculinity. It takes a mentally strong woman to handle being physically stronger and want to explore those dynamics.

This is basically how I feel as well. I have never been to a session (I like my teeth intact) but I fantasize about this scenario as it feels interesting to have a muscular female overpower me and I submit.
Title: Re: Scope of your Fetish
Post by: JoshHornby on September 14, 2017, 04:04:52 am
Not remotely into the domination aspect. I just like jacked up women. 6 weeks or so out of a contest for preference. A woman with some male characteristics, to be sure. But it's a slippery slope. I like a big jaw and strong cheekbones on a woman, even a non muscular one. But someone like Joanie "Chyna" Laurer before her facial surgery is too much. I like a big nose, but Anne Sheehan is too much. Not saying there's anything wrong with either, just not my thing. It's sort of like having a limit on what you like for breast size on a woman.

I've never wanted to suck a dick, but I'd go to town on a big clit. But only if the clit is from PED use. A clit just being really big seems weird to me, as weird as the whole thing is to begin with, I guess. I'm pretty convinced you've gotta be at least a bit bi to find a heavy PED using woman attractive, and I'm okay with that about myself
Title: Re: Scope of your Fetish
Post by: 87fg on September 17, 2017, 03:45:53 am
I think the reason men like the mixed wrestling aspect is that women are showing physical power. It is not just the muscle itself, it is seeing it in motion. Normally, it is rare that you see a woman of such impressive physical stature carrying a man around like a baby. Actually there could just be a separate bodyscissor  fetish. The woman does not have to be muscular, but just have strong legs. The fact that it was once taboo for women to show power becomes enticing when this restriction is lifted. I do think women also get enjoyment out this as well. They may like the idea that can challenge many men on a physical level.
Title: Re: Scope of your Fetish
Post by: GAP on September 18, 2017, 08:20:27 am
Indeed. To me, it is the power that is attractive and not just the muscle.
Title: Re: Scope of your Fetish
Post by: MadameXena on January 21, 2018, 12:27:01 am
I love muscle and with that, athletic endeavour. The harder the sport, the more I like to watch it. The more I would prefer to do it myself.

More than I like seeing it, I like having it. Being strong, being physical and being able to perform above and beyond the norm or what would be expected of me. I have been in that space for so long even with injuries that I sometimes forget just how "not normal" I really am.

But what was a pretty isolated space is starting to get more crowded as women start to "allow" themselves to actually try to be physically powerful. Women have always been strong - you only need to look at images of tribal women carrying large loads on their heads to realise that life has always required people to step up, regardless of gender. With more and more starting to drop the filters on their perceptions of what it is to be female, we will start to see more muscular women. More women showing how strong they are. More women showing competitive fire and grit. We are starting to see it in almost every other sport ...

Except bodybuilding - which is desperately trying to hide the raw, primal energy that it takes to carve a body out of flesh and blood. Is it just me or do bodybuilding competitions seem to want the women to be pretty, ephemeral and untouched by heavy objects?

Damn good thing that there are women out there that just do their thing regardless.
Title: Re: Scope of your Fetish
Post by: mus2kgen on January 22, 2018, 04:58:07 pm
It's always been the asthetic and the attitude and fotitude that comes with; going against the grain and setting themselves apart because they are passionate about their sport.
Title: Re: Scope of your Fetish
Post by: fitgirlfanguy on January 23, 2018, 04:34:13 pm
For me it's mostly about how they look, with lean muscle being part of their total feminine package.  An FBB doesn't need an angelic supermodel face and hair, but a woman with an ugly face, or an uncomplimentary/unfeminine hairstyle isn't going to be as interesting to me as a decent looking face and hair.  Laura Creavalle has a pretty face, some might say exotic, but her 1993 Ms. O hairdo was a non-starter, IMO. 


I discovered my interest in muscular females in the late 80s/early 90s when most amateur competitors weren't that huge but had a different aesthetic, included very few with breast implants, especially disproportionate ones like are so common now (Aleesha Young...).  The strength aspect doesn't really factor in for me.  I don't care if she got that physique with the pink dumbbells or by deadlifting 500 lbs.  It's the exotic look of lean muscle, especially contest or near contest shape, and the dark tan that does it for me.  Many off-season/bulk season women's bodies don't look anything like they do on-season, depending on how much bodyfat they carry or rebound to.  For some, the fact that they weight train and are muscular underneath all that might be hidden by how they look, so much so that their blocky/blobby body might appear like they're just overweight. 


Maybe this should be a post for the threads about dudes here seeking muscular women as mates.  Be prepared that for some, most of the year they don't look like how you may fantasize them to be, as they appear for a month or two around contest time.


Getting back on topic.  Don't give a lick about their male counterparts in the sport.  Sure, one could appreciate their hard work and resulting aesthetic, but as an art lover, I know what I like, and I like decent looking women with ripped muscular physiques. 
Title: Re: Scope of your Fetish
Post by: Rossi on January 24, 2018, 07:57:26 am
I have always been drawn to strong women. Pumped muscles as they workout or pose in photo shoots.
Title: Re: Scope of your Fetish
Post by: crushee on January 24, 2018, 08:13:29 am
Hi,
As far I remember, I have always been attracted to female muscles.
(Many) years ago, when I was a school boy, I could see, sitting behind my desk, a window in the building opposite the street. Sometimes, the lady living in this room would clean the window bare arms. I was fascinated by her muscled arms: one holding the window and the other polishing the window pane... She had great biceps!
I also remember, on my way to school, following almost everyday a lady with huge calves, and especially  when exiting the underground with her calves contracting to their maximum going up the stairs...
Later on, I married a muscled girl who practiced ballet and swimming...
Title: Re: Scope of your Fetish
Post by: gokuman7 on January 29, 2018, 05:36:58 pm
For me its a bit difficult. I like girly faces on women, but I also like the big FBB built, altough with a solid X-frame, so no blocky built for me.

Unfortunately these women almost dont exist.

The only pretty ones are the fitness models, and they are just too small and unimpressive.

They should invent drugs that arent dependent on androgen receptors. Its super-impressive seeing someone like Heather Foster posing, doing a front double, until you see what happened to her face.

What is also important to me is how they look on stage. If you look super-impressive in the off season but you cant win a show for the life of ya, I am less impressed. I mean, its a sport and how impressive you look on stage is most important.

I kinda feel the same way.
Title: Re: Scope of your Fetish
Post by: I like strong women on January 30, 2018, 05:20:41 pm
For me, the concept that is most relevant is the fact that the woman is stronger  than me and able to, and hopefully will control me.
Therefore the look- whether it be "blocky", thick, solid or fitness-style is not as important.
 I am not sure of the "why" but I have always liked strong women and strong looking women. 
This goes back as far into the past as I can remember- all the way back to the days when seeing muscular women was  mostly limited to seeing circus women, women track and field athletes, etc..
Title: Re: Scope of your Fetish
Post by: bicepboy on January 31, 2018, 05:00:40 am
It's a provocative question. I won't say I don't enjoy looking at a muscular bodybuilding male body or that they aren't turn-ons, but it's nothing like what happens when I see a bodybuilding woman. It's all a little confusing, but mostly, it's all fantasy -- jerk-off material, but love worshipping a muscular female form. Masculinized features do take some of the charge out of it. Can get icky. They don't have to totally ripped for me, I guess, since I've enjoyed the off-season look of one especially doe-eyed cute bodybuilder in olden days.
Title: Re: Scope of your Fetish
Post by: sycamore on February 01, 2018, 01:55:17 am
Strictly into women here. Though there are certain inherently masculine features on fbbs that I like:

Masculine features (on a woman) that turn me on:

* Square jaw on a pretty face eg. Rhonda Lundstedt, Elena Seiple, Tina Chandler, Karen Choat
* The bodybuilder "swagger" -- an fbb who walks like a male jock, arms flared out to her sides, chest puffed out
* Grunting while working out
* Some masculine poses: front double biceps, front lat spread, rear lat spread
* Cocky attitude eg. Carla Rossi

Turn offs:
* Most muscular pose. I absolutely HATE this on a woman!
* Facial / body hair
* Deep voice
* Tatoos
* Bulging adam's apple
Title: Re: Scope of your Fetish
Post by: sycamore on February 01, 2018, 03:29:50 am
I also will add that I have a bit of "inverse relationship" with my favorite fbbs: I like to worship them,
pine after them, daydream about them, almost like female groupies used to pine and daydream
after the Beatles. Or Elvis.

In fact I wouldn't mind being a male groupie to a really huge, gorgeous fbb pro, like Shannon Courtney,
or Tina Chandler. 
Title: Re: Scope of your Fetish
Post by: ozzyfm on February 01, 2018, 11:14:57 am
What a wonderful idea: to be a male groupie to Shannon Courtney! Please, sign me in!
Title: Re: Scope of your Fetish
Post by: LuvsFitChicks on February 02, 2018, 06:36:02 pm
Anyone here love seeing FBBs and other fit chicks in tight fit dresses? That is one of my biggest fetishes.

I love go crazy seeing big muscular women in tight fitted dresses like you see women wearing at award shows or at expos.
Title: Re: Scope of your Fetish
Post by: versmuscle12 on April 16, 2018, 12:11:21 am
Very interesting question and I guess my experience goes beyond muscular women, because I just like much larger women in general, i.e. very tall, and powerfully built, even if they have a BBW build.  I am certainly more attracted to more femininity; in other words, I am not attracted to the more masculine "side effects" to very muscular women, just the muscle itself.  However, having said that, I do have an affinity towards transgendered women.  Again, I prefer them to be as feminine as possible, except for what they are packing in their panties.  I have had many sessions (fantasy wrestling/smothering/squash sessions) with very large transgendered women, as large as 6'7" and a different one who was almost 400 lbs.  I do not really think of myself as bisexual or bicurious, but I suppose I am not exactly 100% straight either considering my experiences.  At the end of the day, I think what really draws me in (and I've seen some research on this) is the juxtaposition of it all, i.e. a woman who defies expectations, whether it be due to extremely large size, muscles and/or a penis.  I would be curious to know if anyone else has anything resembling the experiences and interests that I have, particularly when it comes to trans women. 
Title: Re: Scope of your Fetish
Post by: Sheep on June 12, 2018, 12:30:44 pm
Hmm, good one.
I love muscles and a muscular woman is fantastic. However if I was at a competition and there were Male bodybuilders posing I think I would also get turned on as I would love to touch their muscles. But side by side. Female every time.
Title: Re: Scope of your Fetish
Post by: Longing4muscledom93 on June 12, 2018, 04:20:15 pm
Very interesting question and I guess my experience goes beyond muscular women, because I just like much larger women in general, i.e. very tall, and powerfully built, even if they have a BBW build.  I am certainly more attracted to more femininity; in other words, I am not attracted to the more masculine "side effects" to very muscular women, just the muscle itself.  However, having said that, I do have an affinity towards transgendered women.  Again, I prefer them to be as feminine as possible, except for what they are packing in their panties.  I have had many sessions (fantasy wrestling/smothering/squash sessions) with very large transgendered women, as large as 6'7" and a different one who was almost 400 lbs.  I do not really think of myself as bisexual or bicurious, but I suppose I am not exactly 100% straight either considering my experiences.  At the end of the day, I think what really draws me in (and I've seen some research on this) is the juxtaposition of it all, i.e. a woman who defies expectations, whether it be due to extremely large size, muscles and/or a penis.  I would be curious to know if anyone else has anything resembling the experiences and interests that I have, particularly when it comes to trans women.

Very insightful. Thanks for the post :)
Title: Re: Scope of your Fetish
Post by: beowulff on June 12, 2018, 06:11:37 pm
I just love muscle.
On Women, on Men, on me.

I love going to the gym and working out, and watching the other men and women work out.
I love watching their bodies change as they progress.

The more muscle, the better!
Title: Re: Scope of your Fetish
Post by: junglepet77 on June 12, 2018, 06:28:51 pm
As a teen and a young man I always liked tall, busty blondes (or brunettes) those that have a proportional figure but are a bit more busty than they should be. Looking back, as an older man, I've been with women (and a transgender) of all shapes and sizes so who knows? 

Getting back to the tall busty blondes or brunettes in college I had my first role play or domination session. The domina was my type and older, almost 50. I was the young stud at 20. She was fit as well as physically and mentally imposting. I was in and out of the BSDM / role play scene for years, usually with light spanking and light bondage but mostly me being used as a stud by a big, busty dominant lady who played the role of the Amazon.

I never liked the FBB shows on TV in the '80s or early '90s. They seemed to masculine and small for me. In the mid 2000s, after one of my hiatuses from sessioning, I found the world of FBB sessions and ladies who were dominant and / or sensual via massmuscle.com and wb270.com. I never looked back.

If the ladies I sessioned with were curvy, busty, sensual and maybe dominant, I didn't and still don't care if they have deep voices or some body hair. I find FBBs who are on the juice to be voracious which is fine for my Amazon fantasies. Two amazing things I learned in this fetish over the years is: 1. The enormous clits of some FBBs. It is a massive turn on to me; and 2. I'm straight, but I sessioned a few times with a lady I later learned was transgendered. If I were younger it would have shaken me up, but she was a massive turn on. I wish she were still around.
Title: Re: Scope of your Fetish
Post by: GAP on June 13, 2018, 04:22:02 pm
I just love muscle.
On Women, on Men, on me.

I love going to the gym and working out, and watching the other men and women work out.
I love watching their bodies change as they progress.

The more muscle, the better!

I feel you. I just love muscle and strength on a person.
Title: Re: Scope of your Fetish
Post by: bertmacklinsbrother on June 15, 2018, 11:41:27 am
This is a great topic; it's interesting to see everyone describe their own discoveries and limits when it comes to their fetish, and it just showcases that we're all individuals.  No two people are going to like the exact same things and that's awesome.  Recognizing that is the first step in accepting other peoples' tastes, even if they don't do anything for you.

For me, it definitely began with the idea of female strength and ultimately role reversal.  I remember seeing some TV shows and cartoons growing up where women were stronger than men, and right away it triggered something in me.  I loved the strange imagery of a woman overpowering a man and enjoying it; even as a young kid, I understood the taboo of a strong, alpha woman and a weak, submissive male.

Once I discovered female muscle, my fetish certainly took off.  The TV shows and cartoons were fiction afterall, but women were small and men were big and muscular... so those role reversal situations couldn't actually happen, right?  Once I saw male muscles on a female body, I realized that this fascination of mine could become a reality, because there were women out there that WERE bigger and stronger than men.  And that was exciting.

So, overall, the domination aspect has always been important to me.  Even if the relationship is sweet and loving, the muscular body still presents the threat of domination and the ability to overpower.  In that sense, I developed other related interests in strong BBWs, Giantesses, and eventually shemales.  They are all different avenues to females dominating and outsizing men.

As far as attraction to muscular men?  Overall, it hasn't done anything for me.  Personally, the root of my interest has always been showcasing a contrast between genders.  That being said, I do enjoy steroid and masculinization traits in muscle women.  I love the hard pecs, deep voices, strong jaws, engorged clits, body hair, and everything else that's unconventional.  Again, it just continues to compound the fact that a weak, powerless woman has transformed herself into the alpha, and the steroid effects and large muscles are the primary evidence of that.  It's simply exciting to me.
Title: Re: Scope of your Fetish
Post by: taoschild on June 24, 2018, 07:37:45 pm
I agree.  I love the aspect of the taboo role reversal with a woman stronger than a man yet I also appreciate the beauty, hard work, and vasularity of these powerful women.  Perhaps strangely, I never really enjoyed hyper male muscle - in fact I think it is unattractive.
Title: Re: Scope of your Fetish
Post by: outmuscled on June 27, 2018, 12:57:43 am
I agree.  I love the aspect of the taboo role reversal with a woman stronger than a man yet I also appreciate the beauty, hard work, and vasularity of these powerful women.  Perhaps strangely, I never really enjoyed hyper male muscle - in fact I think it is unattractive.

Hear hear. I look at men and women with very different "to be" and "to have" perspectives. With men it's a case of do I want to be like them and do I want to have their muscles, and so I can sometimes admire men aesthetically but there's no attraction. With women, it's a more visceral feeling of do I want to have them and hold them against me ... or not.
And in terms of what I want to be, I like being slim, fit and defined enough to attract women, but I really wouldn't want to be such a big muscular brute that no woman could realistically overpower me. That would eliminate an important part of my fantasy life! And it just goes against my sense of self.

So since I don't want to be like male bodybuilders, I don't like their look either. Which ironically is probably how most women view my beloved female bodybuilders!

It will come as no surprise to those of you share my attraction to often frankly quite masculine fbbs (which I realise is not everybody on here, maybe even a minority) that the the flipside of that that sexual taste is that I don't really identify as hyper-masculine. Just as a male - whose attraction is nevertheless exclusively towards females.
Title: Re: Scope of your Fetish
Post by: versmuscle12 on June 29, 2018, 06:42:29 pm
I agree.  I love the aspect of the taboo role reversal with a woman stronger than a man yet I also appreciate the beauty, hard work, and vasularity of these powerful women.  Perhaps strangely, I never really enjoyed hyper male muscle - in fact I think it is unattractive.

Hear hear. I look at men and women with very different "to be" and "to have" perspectives. With men it's a case of do I want to be like them and do I want to have their muscles, and so I can sometimes admire men aesthetically but there's no attraction. With women, it's a more visceral feeling of do I want to have them and hold them against me ... or not.
And in terms of what I want to be, I like being slim, fit and defined enough to attract women, but I really wouldn't want to be such a big muscular brute that no woman could realistically overpower me. That would eliminate an important part of my fantasy life! And it just goes against my sense of self.

So since I don't want to be like male bodybuilders, I don't like their look either. Which ironically is probably how most women view my beloved female bodybuilders!

It will come as no surprise to those of you share my attraction to often frankly quite masculine fbbs (which I realise is not everybody on here, maybe even a minority) that the the flipside of that that sexual taste is that I don't really identify as hyper-masculine. Just as a male - whose attraction is nevertheless exclusively towards females.

I think this is well said and I am very much in this boat.  While I am probably not as much into the masculine FBBs you describe (though I still would indulge), I have a big attraction to transgendered women, particularly very tall and large.  I do prefer a feminine aesthetic as far as facial features and some curves, but it also drives me wild to think about a woman who is not only much larger and more powerful than me, but also has a much bigger unit.   

With this in mind, I prefer to stay fit but as lean and cut as possible, so as to juxtapose against a woman and maximize the size difference. 
Title: Re: Scope of your Fetish
Post by: beowulff on June 29, 2018, 07:41:22 pm
I agree.  I love the aspect of the taboo role reversal with a woman stronger than a man yet I also appreciate the beauty, hard work, and vasularity of these powerful women.  Perhaps strangely, I never really enjoyed hyper male muscle - in fact I think it is unattractive.

Hear hear. I look at men and women with very different "to be" and "to have" perspectives. With men it's a case of do I want to be like them and do I want to have their muscles, and so I can sometimes admire men aesthetically but there's no attraction. With women, it's a more visceral feeling of do I want to have them and hold them against me ... or not.
And in terms of what I want to be, I like being slim, fit and defined enough to attract women, but I really wouldn't want to be such a big muscular brute that no woman could realistically overpower me. That would eliminate an important part of my fantasy life! And it just goes against my sense of self.

So since I don't want to be like male bodybuilders, I don't like their look either. Which ironically is probably how most women view my beloved female bodybuilders!

It will come as no surprise to those of you share my attraction to often frankly quite masculine fbbs (which I realise is not everybody on here, maybe even a minority) that the the flipside of that that sexual taste is that I don't really identify as hyper-masculine. Just as a male - whose attraction is nevertheless exclusively towards females.

I think this is well said and I am very much in this boat.  While I am probably not as much into the masculine FBBs you describe (though I still would indulge), I have a big attraction to transgendered women, particularly very tall and large.  I do prefer a feminine aesthetic as far as facial features and some curves, but it also drives me wild to think about a woman who is not only much larger and more powerful than me, but also has a much bigger unit.   

With this in mind, I prefer to stay fit but as lean and cut as possible, so as to juxtapose against a woman and maximize the size difference.

Jenna Kroc is your girl!
Title: Re: Scope of your Fetish
Post by: versmuscle12 on June 29, 2018, 08:00:12 pm
Quote
Jenna Kroc is your girl!

Yes!  I actually only just recently discovered her.  I would indeed love to have a session with her, but I am married now so that would require permission!
Title: Re: Scope of your Fetish
Post by: beowulff on June 29, 2018, 08:06:12 pm
Quote
Jenna Kroc is your girl!

Yes!  I actually only just recently discovered her.  I would indeed love to have a session with her, but I am married now so that would require permission!
She could probably satisfy both of you.
Title: Re: Scope of your Fetish
Post by: versmuscle12 on June 29, 2018, 08:10:52 pm
Quote
Jenna Kroc is your girl!

Yes!  I actually only just recently discovered her.  I would indeed love to have a session with her, but I am married now so that would require permission!
She could probably satisfy both of you.

Honestly I have fantasized about this type of scenario but she is not interested, at least not with the candidate I had in mind (Ashley Adair aka Amazon Ashley).
Title: Re: Scope of your Fetish
Post by: outmuscled on June 30, 2018, 01:21:49 pm
Hmm, I think there's all the difference in the world between a masculine woman and an actual man, and attraction to one doesn't cross over into the other. It is of course possible to be attracted to both, but those are separate desires and it's not just a case of liking muscle on anybody.

You can tell a woman by looking in her eyes as well as between her legs and there is just a different sensibility behind those eyes. There is a female identity there, even if she has the most muscular boobless chest and without hairdo and makeup.
I like the role reversal of how they look and how they make me feel, but the reason it's exciting is precisely because it's a woman who's able to turn the tables on me in this way.

I do sometimes look at some of the rock hard muscle women and do a double take, thinking holy fuck who would penetrate who if you found yourself in her lair, but at the end of the day I know the only part of her anatomy she could stick into me is her finger.
Title: Re: Scope of your Fetish
Post by: Candy cane on July 13, 2018, 07:55:52 pm
Goddess Kayla woods is the ultimate in perfect amount of muscle and femininity.
She will wrestle men or women. She is in Chicago
So email her at Kaylawoods777@gmail.com
Title: Re: Scope of your Fetish
Post by: Username13 on July 16, 2018, 08:41:48 pm
Very interesting question and I guess my experience goes beyond muscular women, because I just like much larger women in general, i.e. very tall, and powerfully built, even if they have a BBW build.  I am certainly more attracted to more femininity; in other words, I am not attracted to the more masculine "side effects" to very muscular women, just the muscle itself.  However, having said that, I do have an affinity towards transgendered women.  Again, I prefer them to be as feminine as possible, except for what they are packing in their panties.  I have had many sessions (fantasy wrestling/smothering/squash sessions) with very large transgendered women, as large as 6'7" and a different one who was almost 400 lbs.  I do not really think of myself as bisexual or bicurious, but I suppose I am not exactly 100% straight either considering my experiences.  At the end of the day, I think what really draws me in (and I've seen some research on this) is the juxtaposition of it all, i.e. a woman who defies expectations, whether it be due to extremely large size, muscles and/or a penis.  I would be curious to know if anyone else has anything resembling the experiences and interests that I have, particularly when it comes to trans women.

I'm essentially the same. I love trans women and strong women, so when the two combine... well. There are actually quite a few girls out there that combine the two, although not too many that do sessions. Giulia Grandi (giuliatrans.com) is the first to come to mind. over 6'0 and 175+ pounds, and offers the usual session experience.
Title: Re: Scope of your Fetish
Post by: versmuscle12 on July 17, 2018, 12:14:06 pm
Quote
I'm essentially the same. I love trans women and strong women, so when the two combine... well. There are actually quite a few girls out there that combine the two, although not too many that do sessions. Giulia Grandi (giuliatrans.com) is the first to come to mind. over 6'0 and 175+ pounds, and offers the usual session experience.

Yeah I remember seeing and reading through her profile when she first started offering sessions.  I was wondering if you or any others had any meetings with her.  She seemed very promising because she had both the legit wrestling/combat skill and also the trans element.
Title: Re: Scope of your Fetish
Post by: marco76ers on July 17, 2018, 03:24:23 pm
For me, it all started as an early teenager watching some bodybuilders on tv. Here in Brazil, TV coverage was almost non existant (still today), but sometimes a tv show presented a man or a woman with muscles. To see those girls in tiny bikinis posing and showing all their power really got my attention. And why not, seeing a guy also with a very small posing trunk made me wonder if he could get any excitement doing that.

Then came a day when a sports show came up with some highlights from a contest, and I saw a man and a woman posing together. It really caught my attention in a very sexual way. I thought "there is no way they are not excited to be posing there, the girl in a thong, the guy in a tiny suit, he must be getting a boner - although it did not seem to be the case - by being there".

From then on, the mixed pairs became my main focus, I just love the idea of a man and a woman being on the stage, barely naked performing sensual poses demonstrating their power. I started to wonder how would I react if it was me on that stage (and how my dick would react).

But in general, I just prefer the contest posing, when men and women are ate their top, showing almost everything, and all the excitement that comes with it. Seeing a girl in a tiny bikini (or even thongs like nabba) really makes me hard. And why not, even being male, why not admire a guy doing their routine, even more if he is on a boner (which I always wonder that would be my reaction if I ever hit the stage). And in my case, with the two performing together...
Title: Re: Scope of your Fetish
Post by: Username13 on July 17, 2018, 04:46:56 pm
Quote
I'm essentially the same. I love trans women and strong women, so when the two combine... well. There are actually quite a few girls out there that combine the two, although not too many that do sessions. Giulia Grandi (giuliatrans.com) is the first to come to mind. over 6'0 and 175+ pounds, and offers the usual session experience.

Yeah I remember seeing and reading through her profile when she first started offering sessions.  I was wondering if you or any others had any meetings with her.  She seemed very promising because she had both the legit wrestling/combat skill and also the trans element.

Nope, on the bucket list though. Have some other experiences but probably not appropriate for this board lol.
Title: Re: Scope of your Fetish
Post by: MaxSideburns72 on July 19, 2018, 09:00:30 am
I can't remember when it started, when I was around 14-15 yrs old so 30 yrs ago.
In Italy it was very hard to even have info about muscular ladies, few magazines and talking just about men. Here comes my interest into just WOMEN, never been attracted by muscular men at all, that's probably why I hear the ring when listen to a malish voice on a ultra muscular girl due to large amount of steroids.
I am not attracted particularly by muscles (just like them large and hard on female legs, which is possible without roids). On the other hand I like large breast, large heavy (not implants), so my ideal is a large girl, with a large breast and an impressive strength. So to see a large girl overpower a not trained man or lift a car on a back tyre is the top view!