Pages:
Actions
  • #1 by mangodebango on 31 Dec 2016


  • #2 by phalanx3 on 04 Jan 2017
  • insta****?
  • #3 by RobMash on 16 Jan 2017



  • #4 by megamec on 23 Jan 2017
  • Wow, huge
  • #5 by matadore10 on 02 Mar 2017
  • #6 by matadore10 on 02 Mar 2017
  • #7 by matadore10 on 02 Mar 2017
  • v
  • #8 by matadore10 on 02 Mar 2017
  • #9 by Drvo on 27 Mar 2017
  • Holy hell, I've not seen this girl before. That is great!
  • #10 by mecury01 on 19 May 2017
  •  :thanks:I love her thick legs and thighs. thanks for posting
  • #11 by matadore10 on 05 Jun 2017
  • #12 by Marc Hugo on 14 Jun 2017
  • I love those legs, but I have a question. Are some girls using inflating stuff? Sometimes it is unreal. I remember very rare cases in the past (large use of roids though), Tina Lockwood was out of any mind. Actually now I can see several huge thighs

    Funnily enough Tina Lockwood never used anabolic steroids as such until the last year and a half of her presence from a publicity point of view via Ray Martin, Steve Wennerstrom, Bill Jentz (WPP/Women's Physique World).  She rose entirely to fame on the back of two things, HGH and insulin (and obviously tons of food and weight training).  Nothing else.  This is of course why she never got into competition shape.  If you recall, right before she vanished off the scene she  did a couple of shoots and vids with RM and by that time footage was being marketed dually with WSP.

    Just a point to bear in mind.  The term "inflating stuff" might refer to oils such as escicline, synthol etc.  Now and then, sure but you can see that is not the case here.  Here the athlete is just short and does lots of heavy leg work as well as taking a fair amount of food and anabolics.  Women generally don't need to take much for profound results and they prefer DHT derivatives.

    Also SARMs for the long term are very frequently used. 

    Marc
  • #13 by matadore10 on 14 Jun 2017


  •      
  • #14 by matadore10 on 17 Jul 2017
  • #15 by matadore10 on 26 Jul 2017
Pages:
Actions