Forum Saradas
Private Sessions => Cities / Countries and announcements => Topic started by: Christal Cornick on December 06, 2018, 12:43:00 pm
-
Hello guys :)
As many of you know I offer sessions.
I’m wondering something.
Question 1
do you prefer the ripped condition with abs and veins popping, or off-season big bulky but smoother looking ....or do you prefer somewhere in between (where I usually hold myself)
Question 2
Also, does it matter to you if a woman is huge but has damaged her feminine facial features? Or do you prefer a woman with huge muscles who still has a feminine face?
-
Hello marvellous Christal,
to answer your questions :-
1. I prefer the in between condition, with a slight bias towards big bulky off season.
2. As feminine facially as the exacting strength and body building regime allows.
I am a great admirer of strong and muscular women who love being as they are, for their own self satisfaction.
You are a credit to the diversity of what women can do and be, and should be extremely proud of your achievements !!
I hope one day to be able to meet you in a strength and muscle appreciation session. Keep strong and beautiful ! :-* :thanks:
-
Huge, ripped and vascular!
As for facial features - I don't know of ANY unattractive female bodybuilders!
-
Question 1 I prefer ripped. But question 2, I prefer feminine features, but don't really care. The session is about the body and muscles for me.
-
The truth is that there aren't so many huge women around that most guys can afford to be picky. That being said, I prefer off-season or in-between to contest, which generally implies softer facial features, but I don't discriminate. #2 is a loaded question as the "damage" that's often attributed to bodybuilding can occur in a lot of ways not related to the side effects associated with building muscle. Too much time on the tanning bed. Not all women start out life looking like a cover model, could just be the way she looks. Or normal aging. Many of the biggest women are in their forties and fifties now. Some guys can't seem to reconcile a woman not looking as good to them at 48 as they did at 28 without jumping to the conclusion it's due to "abuse."
-
I prefer leaner and a more feminine face
-
This Shape,I dont Know which category does it fall in
(http://thumbs2.imagebam.com/78/46/7c/bdb1041058047924.jpg) (http://www.imagebam.com/image/bdb1041058047924) (http://thumbs2.imagebam.com/85/93/ab/052ac31058047954.jpg) (http://www.imagebam.com/image/052ac31058047954)
-
I usually go for as bulky and huge as possible. Love enormous females, being a straight male amateur bodybuilder myself. As for facial features, I confess I feel attracted to the "roid look". Maybe it's just me, but it's a good indicator of dedication and hard work, and gets the best of me.
-
I prefer the in between condition, with a slight bias towards big bulky off season.
And I also prefer most the feminine face.
-
1 - offseason bulky look
2 - feminine features
-
(http://thumbs2.imagebam.com/49/f5/50/5093231077776644.jpg) (http://saradas.org/index.php?topic=531176.0)
-
1. I like the girl to be off season but still with that 'off season definition and not totally smooth. Shannon Courtney often was in this shape. Peaked but rounder softer biceps. Bulky but her muscles still POP. 2. Like most guys have answered the more feminine face the better. Also relating back to #1 an off season face is much better than an emaciated and dehydrated contest day face.
-
1. In between but leaning towards ripped. Like a fbb looks three to six weeks out from a show. Abs are my Kryptonite.
2. Feminine is definitely better but it's not a dealbreaker. My thing is body hair: if it's been a while since she has shaved, that can ruin a session for me. Smooth skin over hard muscle is the only way to go.
-
big and bulky- with a female face.
-
I like the in between look. Some vascularity, but not ripped with a drawn contest face etc. Feminine face / hair are important.
-
Hello Christal,
Well, I answered the poll, but I'd also like to say a little more.
I'm someone who can't really get into the mode of "exploiting" someone, especially not an intimate partner. Yes, sessions are commercial transactions, but I never get away from the awareness that the session-giver is also a person like myself. The relationship is one of mutual respect (one hopes).
And that being so, I cannot feel good about a woman doing outright harmful things to her body. I like muscles on women, primarily because I like strength and health. Certain signs directly go against this: badly-done implants (or indeed breast implants of any kind, I personally wish they didn't exist), staying in contest shape for too long (the dehydration and prolonged period of low body fat percentage), evidence of excessive use of anabolic steroids that hasn't been effectively counteracted by the relevant pharmaceutical products, etc.
I would say that in addition to your good self, Christal, I would also find Sarah Dunlap (in off-season shape) pretty much my ideal of perfection. Contest shape would also be tremendously attractive. Katka Kyptova's leanness is also a real turn-on, but equally, Jennie Roosa and Natasha Aughey in off-season shape are exceptionally dreamy.
-
I prefer big and bulky, though I love the in between look as well.
I like a feminine face, but If I am looking for a session I first identify the ladies that are above a certain size, then choose among them based on personality and attractiveness. Someone can be very attractive to me without being hyper feminine, but I also think off-season softens the facial features and brings about some of that femininity that can be harder to see during contest season.
-
I prefer:
1. Just-walked-off-the-stage contest shredded with veins and striations everywhere.
2. Feminine features
-
In between and as others have said; I dont know of any women bodybuilders that dont have beautiful faces.
-
1. More on the ripped side. If timing means absolutely shredded, that’s great also. I do love abs and veins. At least some overall definition is fine but that as far as my taste goes to the non-ripped side of the spectrum.
2. I’m not that picky about types of faces, actually. As far as make-up and styling, I’m fine with whatever the woman wants to do.
-
Hi Christal
Here are my impressions
1. The more ripped, the better for me. Veiny, striated, you know :)
2. I have no problem with the face, cannot ask a woman to make that terrible effort, being ripped, but at the same time keep some fat tissue on the face for femininity? makes no sense to me
-
The huge offseason look and that doesn’t matter to me
-
Somewhere in between but slightly on the leaner side.
-
I'm limited in my experience but I'd say veins and striations are the best. I love the onstage look and in my head that's what I always imagine and yearn for.
-
Ripped, vascular, tanned, oiled up and pumped up is my preferred look. Off-season look is rubbish.
I don't mind face looking a bit haggard and drawn but deep rasping voice, acne, stubbly coarse body hair on back, tits or shoulders and a five o'clock shadow are most unwelcome.
-
I think it all varies from woman to woman. Some women can carry more muscle and still look feminine. Lora Ottenad is a prime example of someone who has kept her face looking very attractive yet carries lots of muscle. She can lean out, yet her face stays pretty. For me hairstyle plays a role too, short hair or having one side of your head shaved off just makes things worse.
-
Wondering if Christal is still reading?
For me it depends on the woman: some I find atractive in stage condition, as the hard curves come perfectly out. Others I prefer in offseason, as they get too dried out in top condition.
I think we have never met (hold on: once we have long time ago), but I would be looking for your in between look, fairly close to contest. Speculating, and wish thinking ... needless to say: your body looks fantastic this and that way throughout the year.
-
Hi Cristal !
-are you still in the business, doing sessions...?! - have hope you read a new article in this old blog..?!
if yes,would be cool if you start a travel tour ,at least around europe: for sure you `d find alot of fans(and clients) ,included me...?!