Forum Saradas
saradas.org
gfxgfx
 
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
www.pharmacomstore.ws
 
gfx gfx
gfxgfx
 
Welcome to Forum Saradas! Female Bodybuilding, Fitness, Figure & Bikini
 
gfx gfx
gfx
378466 Posts in 50952 Topics by 41684 Members - Latest Member: Coolerboy October 23, 2017, 09:37:25 am
*
gfx* Home | Help | Login | Register | gfx
gfx
Forum Saradas  |  Female BodyBuilding & Fitness & Figure - Members Area  |  Tastes and opinions of Saradas members  |  Big tattoos vs no tattoo
gfx
gfxgfx
 

Author Topic: Big tattoos vs no tattoo  (Read 10455 times)

Offline jdg130

  • Lurker
  • *
  • Posts: 16
  • Activity:
    0%
  • KARMA: 25
  • Gender: Male
  • Female Bodybuilding
Re: Big tattoos vs no tattoo
« Reply #15 on: February 10, 2017, 06:35:54 am »
I am a strong believer in to each their own...that said I don't care for too much tattooing on women. Totally my personal preference, but it takes something away in my opinion.

Offline real_iluvmuscle

  • Lurker
  • *
  • Posts: 7
  • Activity:
    0%
  • KARMA: 9
  • Gender: Male
  • Female Bodybuilding, Physique, Fitness, Figure & Bikini
Re: Big tattoos vs no tattoo
« Reply #16 on: February 14, 2017, 11:58:38 pm »
Not a fan of tats of any kind. If it's big enough, it takes away from the display of muscle which is what bodybuilding contests are supposed to be about.
"I like to imagine this colossal female lifting my nake and limp body,face up and my legs totaly spead, in a perfect gorilla press over her head like if she give me in sacrifice."

- Sir Perry of Canada

Offline bkrugby

  • Lurker
  • *
  • Posts: 329
  • Activity:
    10%
  • KARMA: 127
Re: Big tattoos vs no tattoo
« Reply #17 on: March 03, 2017, 11:44:41 pm »
I'd likely be more into Melody Spetko if she didn't have that huge tattoo across her chest.


Offline deleted user

  • Lurker
  • *
  • Posts: 8
  • Activity:
    0%
  • KARMA: 3
  • Female Bodybuilding, Physique, Fitness, Figure & Bikini
Re: Big tattoos vs no tattoo
« Reply #18 on: March 11, 2017, 01:17:07 am »
I never like tattoos regardless on who it is.

Offline IronHeaver

  • Lurker
  • *
  • Posts: 4
  • Activity:
    0%
  • KARMA: 5
  • Gender: Female
  • Female Bodybuilding, Physique,
Re: Big tattoos vs no tattoo
« Reply #19 on: March 30, 2017, 12:16:09 am »
NO
Just no.

Bodybuilders are beautiful human sculpture.They shouldn't ruin it with somebody else's lousy graffiti.
It's like a house full of clutter,and bric-a brac.Visual trash.
It seems like everyone is trying so hard to be unique...by copying the crowd.It just doesn't make the impression people think it does.
Regarding the judging;it should count against a competitor.Skin should look healthy,and attractive on a physique athlete.
But they won't have the guts to stand against something popular.it might cost the contests entrance fees.

Offline makko1

  • Lurker
  • *
  • Posts: 144
  • Activity:
    6.67%
  • KARMA: 40
  • Female Bodybuilding, Physique, Fitness, Figure & Bikini
Re: Big tattoos vs no tattoo
« Reply #20 on: April 10, 2017, 08:55:12 am »
NO for me too.
I am very sad when I discover an fbb has chosen to tattoo. Except for very little spotty tattoos not hiding the shape and the simmetry I am not for them. But many fbb perhaps consider them a part of their personal transformation. I has to be tollerated, I think. But I don't like. 

Offline TheFranksterChannel

  • Lurker
  • *
  • Posts: 313
  • Activity:
    23.33%
  • KARMA: 511
  • Gender: Male
  • Muscle Women Art
Re: Big tattoos vs no tattoo
« Reply #21 on: April 10, 2017, 04:50:04 pm »
I'm not into tattoos.
I'm FMG art.

Offline Soapbox

  • Lurker
  • *
  • Posts: 2
  • Activity:
    0%
  • KARMA: 1
  • Female Bodybuilding, Physique, Fitness, Figure & Bikini
Re: Big tattoos vs no tattoo
« Reply #22 on: April 20, 2017, 06:07:39 pm »
Another vote for no tattoos.

Offline Gemma

  • Lurker
  • *
  • Posts: 204
  • Activity:
    80%
  • KARMA: 261
  • Female Bodybuilding, Physique, Fitness, Figure & Bikini
Re: Big tattoos vs no tattoo
« Reply #23 on: April 24, 2017, 06:30:13 pm »
It can be more attractive & I like the Celtic Armband type, like sa2009 has put in his post in the pic on the left but the spider web is growing on me,
Nothing good happens in the warm up.

Offline Denise Rutkowski Fan

  • Lurker
  • *
  • Posts: 213
  • Activity:
    23.33%
  • KARMA: 444
  • Portraying a true depiction of Denise Rutkowski.
Re: Big tattoos vs no tattoo
« Reply #24 on: May 05, 2017, 10:20:30 am »
Slightly contentious I guess, but personally I get turned off by tattoos and IMHO, I think it takes away from bodybuilders raison d'etre which is to maximize and accentuate the aesthetics behind their hard built muscles (physiques)....I don't mind Denise Rutkowski's ankle tattoo which is barely noticeable but sleeve tattoos for example would make the most beautiful woman, horrendous from my modest point of view...just an opinion!
If you have anything new or old to share about Denise Rutkowski please contribute here

Offline xepha

  • Lurker
  • *
  • Posts: 69
  • Activity:
    10%
  • KARMA: 11
Re: Big tattoos vs no tattoo
« Reply #25 on: May 09, 2017, 02:11:47 am »
tats don't add anything, especially to a muscular woman.  the irony is that tats were typically signs of subjugation, i.e. imprisonment, internment, concentration camps, etc.  now they are just empty signifiers. 

the late 80s FBBers were the pinnacle - no tats, few with implants - and increasingly with time those physiques seem unimaginable now.  Pretty much any younger woman into physical culture now will also be susceptible to tats.  An exception who reminds me of that golden era is Chelsey Coleman, and I think even she has one (though I think it's hardly noticeable, not least bc the rest of her is so glorious).

Bottom line is I'm too old...


Offline sa2009

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1112
  • Activity:
    100%
  • KARMA: 6947
Re: Big tattoos vs no tattoo
« Reply #26 on: May 09, 2017, 04:58:48 am »
I agree !  while i'am not against them all , a select few have them done tastefully . But sadly most are taken to the extreme for the sake of it . Find it interesting that something that came from the prison culture ..   is now so widely adored .
I Saradas 

FOR V.I.P. FORUMS ACCESS

Offline Kitamurafan

  • Lurker
  • *
  • Posts: 19
  • Activity:
    0%
  • KARMA: 13
  • Gender: Male
  • Author
Re: Big tattoos vs no tattoo
« Reply #27 on: June 13, 2017, 10:42:49 pm »
No tattoos at all is the best.

Offline OldSchmoe67

  • Lurker
  • *
  • Posts: 101
  • Activity:
    100%
  • KARMA: 70
  • Female Bodybuilding, Physique, Fitness, Figure & Bikini
Re: Big tattoos vs no tattoo
« Reply #28 on: June 13, 2017, 11:30:45 pm »
There's no box for indifferent.

Offline dad123

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1866
  • Activity:
    0%
  • KARMA: 6719
  • Gender: Male
Re: Big tattoos vs no tattoo
« Reply #29 on: June 19, 2017, 05:52:48 pm »
the tats take away from what they are training so hard to achieve.the first thing you notice is the tats not the body.
I Saradas 

FOR V.I.P. FORUMS ACCESS


Forum Saradas  |  Female BodyBuilding & Fitness & Figure - Members Area  |  Tastes and opinions of Saradas members  |  Big tattoos vs no tattoo
 

gfxgfx
Forum Saradas does not host any files on its own servers.
gfx
It only points to various links on the Internet that already exist.
It is recommended to buy Original Video, CD, DVD's and pictures only.
gfx