tats don't add anything, especially to a muscular woman. the irony is that tats were typically signs of subjugation, i.e. imprisonment, internment, concentration camps, etc. now they are just empty signifiers.
the late 80s FBBers were the pinnacle - no tats, few with implants - and increasingly with time those physiques seem unimaginable now. Pretty much any younger woman into physical culture now will also be susceptible to tats. An exception who reminds me of that golden era is Chelsey Coleman, and I think even she has one (though I think it's hardly noticeable, not least bc the rest of her is so glorious).
Bottom line is I'm too old...