Found this a couple of days ago and wanted to rant. It’s all in good nature. Don’t worry, I’m not livid with the creator, just wanted to speak my mind:
Absolutely horrible comparison! Whoever created this…shame on you!
Top ranked former Ms. Olympia’s like Rachel McLish or Carla Dunlap are perfect examples of how much women have progressed over the years being that Rachel and Carla were not massive competitors, but ranked number 1 in the world among female bodybuilders as Ms. O title holders.
However, Cathey Palyo is a different story. She's one of the pioneers, if not the first, to bring big muscles of her type to the stage. Not only was she the most consistent amateur competitor in wins during her days, but was also the first American Ms. International winner. The woman was built!
Cathey had probably the most notable back development in the 80’s and to scale down a photo and compare her to Figure women of today is just terrible and appalling. Even by today’s standards, she would make Figure girls look small. For instance, imagine Erin Stern in a comparison and posedown with Cathey. Cathey would wipe the stage with her and win the judges over with little to no effort. Flawless victory! No contest!
The 80’s or 90’s should never be regarded as an era where female bodybuilders were generally smaller, with the exception of Fitness/Figure girls. Countless female bodybuilders were quite big in the 80’s, but didn’t receive recognition, because the industry did not want women to go to the extremes like the men, so they were neither promoted or judged fairly in various shows.
1986 World Amateur Championships – IFBBCathey Palyo (1st place) Vs. Hannie Van Aken (3rd place)
Would love to see how they compared on stage. Hannie was a huge lady! She was another with a glorious and majestic back. I wonder how she faired in comparison to Cathey.