Do not trust WB270 site

[crabdone]

WB posts travel as a free service for the women and clients.  They make nothing from it at all. If you want updated photos you should see if they have a sessiongirls.com profile; on this site the women admin their own profiles and can add recent photos. You can also ask them to direct you to a recent photo on social media. 

[Duke69]

Sessiongirls is now such an awesome site that I don't understand why anyone is paying much attention to wb270.  Unless it gets updated it is now an antique. 

[M7]

Wb270 has been extremely useful over the years and I commend him for it. I usually check both sites. There's nothing wrong with having more than one option.

[Alina-fan]

I only trust wb270 when it comes to booking sessions.

[Warhawk Overdrive]

Wb270 has been extremely useful over the years and I commend him for it. I usually check both sites. There's nothing wrong with having more than one option.

Not all women are listed on both sites

[bruce321]

Wb270 has been extremely useful over the years and I commend him for it. I usually check both sites. There's nothing wrong with having more than one option.

Not all women are listed on both sites

Beat me to it. Ms Melissa seems to be a WB270 exclusive. For her alone I'd keep checking there. But I've also seen cases where women listed on both sites are shown with different travel plans. You'd think that would mean WB270 would be the one missing something since the women can update SG themselves, but sometimes it goes the other way.

[Ijack74]

Wb270 has been extremely useful over the years and I commend him for it. I usually check both sites. There's nothing wrong with having more than one option.

Not all women are listed on both sites

Beat me to it. Ms Melissa seems to be a WB270 exclusive. For her alone I'd keep checking there. But I've also seen cases where women listed on both sites are shown with different travel plans. You'd think that would mean WB270 would be the one missing something since the women can update SG themselves, but sometimes it goes the other way.

The same goes for Lora Ottenad which is the main reason why I use WB270.

[ji_scott]

I use both equally, and while there's lots of overlap between the two, each month one or two visiting wrestlers only appear on one and not the other. 

Ripped Princess, another popular wrestler, is only on WB270.

[Warhawk Overdrive]

and Sessiongirls again just posted a fake profile smh

Too bad. I'm at the point where if she has real muscle my first thought is she is not in the US or its a fake profile. 

Still can't figure out why anyone would waste the time. In a community as small as this and considering she is in US, Canada or the UK. Someone would find out its not her before the person who put it up could, what? Scam a few deposits???

[tarzan7]

Wb270 way more reliable than sessiongirls.  Sessiongirls known to have fake profiles.  Also A sessionette told me something that she didnt list herself on session girls cause it sounds/looks way more like an escort site than wb270.

Wb270 still king.

I just came online to comment on sessiongirls.com. I like the graphics. It is a good idea. BUT they have to do a better job on fake profiles AND women who are NOT female bodybuilders, wrestlers and/or strong dominas. Some questionable profiles on that site, sad to say.

[Duke69]

Have any of you reported a fake profile on SG and it was not taken down with in a few days?  Only the girl in the photo knows exactly for sure if the profile is real or not, has anyone reached out to her?  Has she reported the fake profile and it has not been taken down?   I think it is very unfair to hold SG responsible without more information and this seems like a witch hunt to me. 

        I think beauty is in the eye of the beholder, who is supposed to judge if a girl has enough muscle to be on the site and how could it possibly be done?   Maybe we should have a panel of schomes to judge each girls profile and vote if she should be on the site and then have an appeals panel to review the first panels findings.  Then a 3rd panel just in case the first 2 panels got it wrong lol.   As long as a girls pictures  and profile are accurate it is up to our wallets to judge if she should be on the site.  Guys giving real reviews on the girls here are the best safeguard to keep the girls honest.  How many of you guys who want more safeguards to protect us have went out and defended girls against allegations when you were not directly involved in a situation and had no direct knowledge about it but posted in her defense anyway.  Some discussions here really go off the cliff.

[tarzan7]

Duke69, I understand what you are saying and don't want to go down a rabbit hole on this. And any site featuring our type of ladies is welcome. But sessiongirls, on one of its opening page slides says it is for "athletic sessions " and "not escorts," as a warning. As someone who has been around a while the overwhelming majority of the ladies on it are absolutely legit. But there are some that seem to be refugees from the closing of Backpage, etc. and there are a few, whose pics at least, were used in escort ads. Some are either grossly overweight or skin & bones and not athletic at all. The value of Saradas is reviews, who is legit and who is not, etc. The wb270 and sessiongirls provide a service. But as the Ancient Romans once said, "Let the buyer beware."

[bruce321]

Duke69, I understand what you are saying and don't want to go down a rabbit hole on this. And any site featuring our type of ladies is welcome. But sessiongirls, on one of its opening page slides says it is for "athletic sessions " and "not escorts," as a warning. As someone who has been around a while the overwhelming majority of the ladies on it are absolutely legit. But there are some that seem to be refugees from the closing of Backpage, etc. and there are a few, whose pics at least, were used in escort ads. Some are either grossly overweight or skin & bones and not athletic at all. The value of Saradas is reviews, who is legit and who is not, etc. The wb270 and sessiongirls provide a service. But as the Ancient Romans once said, "Let the buyer beware."

Athletic sessions typically means wrestling. The woman that wrestles doesn't have to be athletic to qualify, just needs to be willing. I used to go on an old Yahoo group for session women. If you posted about an FBB or even fitness level muscle, you'd get negative comments. There's a large group of guys out there who like wrestling, but have mainstream tastes in women. They  don't want athletic women. Some of them are chubby chasers. Yeah, I've seen the plus size women on Session Girls. They have reviews. Somebody paid good money to see them. A lot of regular looking women are on WB270 as well. Neither site is exclusively for us. Some of the women on both sites are also escorts. But unlike Backpage, neither site directly allows advertising those services.

Nujerz, that's just one woman's opinion. Not that she's wrong. An escort site shows scantily clad pictures, a woman's stats, a bio, and a list of services. So does a session site. WB270 and Session Girls have the exact same content. If WB270 was updated to display pictures instead of burying them as links, it'd have a similar appearance to Session Girls. Any practical distinction between the two is in her mind. It's the same clients using both, and if somebody from the outside world catches you on either, the judgement is going to be the same.

[Admirer4fbb]

Sessiongifrls website does a better job keeping updated than wb270 site.
I had sent the guy running wb270 site couple reviews of sessions I had.  One 4 months ago &  the 2nd last month.  NEITHER was ever posted on wb270 website!
The same two reviews I sent to Sessiongirls website and within couple days they were posted.
And the lady I recently sessioned with said she tried couple times to have her photos updated on wb270 site.  But the guy never updated her photos! And she,  after a month still waiting!
If the person running the wb270 site is too busy to update he needs to "step down"!
I think waiting 4 months for an update is more than fair!
I have totally given up waisting my time emailing reviews to the Wb270 site,  which 
And I know it can be done because the person running Sessiongirls website does updates in a "timely manner"!
As to "fake profiles",  there are those who's very good at scamming.  I don't think there's anyway to totally prevent it.

[uxello [abracadabra]]

Some are either grossly overweight or skin & bones and not athletic at all. The value of Saradas is reviews, who is legit and who is not, etc. The wb270 and sessiongirls provide a service. But as the Ancient Romans once said, "Let the buyer beware."

I agree with this, but there are some women who advertise themselves as "BBWs." There are apparently guys into that. I personally think it's gross and pretty sad that they're fetishizing their extremely unhealthy bodies instead of trying to lose some weight. I do wish there was a way to just filter out all pictures of BBWs from appearing on the front page. It grosses me out to see a picture of a 500 lb. woman.

Anyway, I don't think Jennifer cares that some women are getting paid by men to have sex on her site, whether it's that upfront, or happens after a few minutes of muscle worship. She just wants to avoid trouble. We all know what happens in these sessions, and we all know every single session is sexually motivated, whether it's traditional sex or something kinkier.

The same two reviews I sent to Sessiongirls website and within couple days they were posted.

On the flip side, if it's a negative review, even a legit one, the girl is most likely friends with Jennifer and will get it removed immediately. That's why boards like this one are useful.