Sessiongifrls website does a better job keeping updated than wb270 site.
I had sent the guy running wb270 site couple reviews of sessions I had. One 4 months ago & the 2nd last month. NEITHER was ever posted on wb270 website!
The same two reviews I sent to Sessiongirls website and within couple days they were posted.
And the lady I recently sessioned with said she tried couple times to have her photos updated on wb270 site. But the guy never updated her photos! And she, after a month still waiting!
If the person running the wb270 site is too busy to update he needs to "step down"!
I think waiting 4 months for an update is more than fair!
I have totally given up waisting my time emailing reviews to the Wb270 site, which
And I know it can be done because the person running Sessiongirls website does updates in a "timely manner"!
As to "fake profiles", there are those who's very good at scamming. I don't think there's anyway to totally prevent it.
You apparently sent me an email of complaint a few days ago, complaining abut the non-posted reviews and photos. When I went to find the reviews by searching for other emails from that same sender, Yahoo mail didn't find any other emails from that same sender. It might have been because they wound up in the yahoo spam folder, or because you used a different email to send them.
I don't give either reviews or photo changes/additions a particularly high priority. I'm not trying to compete with Sessiongirls as a picture site and I think that few women change dramatically every few months. My order of priority is:
1. removals - at least if the woman wants to get off quickly, which is often the case.
2. travel
3. new additions
4. reviews
5. photos
I will say that whether I use photos or reviews at all is an editorial decision I make. I am virtually certain to use a tightly written (100 words or less) review about actual wrestling (or boxing) which I see as the focus of wb270. A review that is more about you than the girl, is unlikely to be used. A wordy review about muscle worship is likely to either be edited down, or not used at all. Unless role play involves some element of real overpowering or wrestling, I may give it rather short shift. If it's a first review for a new girl I'm likely to be more tolerant. I don't think that papers run every letter to the editor, and I don't feel compelled to use every review. There are some trite phrases, such as the many variations on "do not be deceived by..." that I either edit out or I discard the whole review. And there are some things I think are just in bad taste.
I am not trying to run a photo site. I'm offended by pictures shot in a bathroom using a cellphone and a mirror. You can take a good picture with a modern cell phone but many of the pics I get are badly exposed, out of focus and poorly composed. There are pictures that I think are just in bad taste. I fancy that I run a PG13 level website. I also get many really good high quality pics, and I'm much more likely to use them. If you send me pics that are more than 1280 pixels on their longest dimension, I usually resize them, which takes time. If they are not jpegs I make them jpegs. My deal with the Valkyrie site, which hosts wb270.com, is that I don't compete with their pay muscle photo site. I am not going to add new photos or replace monthly or more than about a couple a year. I try to limit women to 8 pictures, although there are women who have pestered me into more. There are quite a number of women who would like many more pictures and want me to post new pictures every few weeks. I'm not doing that.
I'm trying to achieve something of a balance, so that one basic HTML format works reasonably well for small screen call phones with low bandwidth data service, and for people who are using a fancy iMac with a fast internet connection. Hence you always have to click on a picture to see it. I started out with a website intended for people who were mainly using a computer with a fair size screen, but most likely using something like a 9600 baud dial up modem. I want to edit a lot of things (eg reviews) for brevity to make it easy for users with small screens. And, frankly, a lot of long reviews are just embarrassingly written.
In any event, if you don't like wb270, nobody makes you use it, and if you do use it, you're getting it for free.