Forum Saradas
gfxgfx
 
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
clearskypharmacy
 
gfx gfx
www.pharmacomstore.ws
gfxgfx
 
Welcome to Forum Saradas! Female Bodybuilding, Fitness, Figure & Bikini
 
gfx gfx
gfx
412844 Posts in 56174 Topics by 30062 Members - Latest Member: sunkist5us October 22, 2018, 08:39:31 pm
*
gfx* Home | Help | Login | Register | gfx
gfx
Forum Saradas  |  Female BodyBuilding & Fitness & Figure - Members Area  |  Russian Female Bodybuilding & Female Bodybuilders  |  Nataliya Kuznetsova (Trukhina) Amazonka
gfx
gfxgfx
 

Author Topic: Nataliya Kuznetsova (Trukhina) Amazonka  (Read 1904922 times)

Offline h666666

  • Lurker
  • *
  • Posts: 61
  • Activity:
    30%
  • KARMA: 169
  • Female Bodybuilding, Physique, Fitness, Figure & Bikini
Re: Nataliya Kuznetsova (Trukhina) Amazonka
« Reply #330 on: November 05, 2017, 09:35:20 am »
11-4-17



At what point do you morph deniers/apologists (you know who you are) start feeling a little ridiculous?
 :tongue:

Oh, I don't know: maybe when she posts her first morph, and we fall for it?

Or: when we realise how pointless it is to discuss this with the morph conspiracy theorists?

Dude, she looks like this on her webcam, you can check for yourself any time you want.

Offline kevin1

  • Lurker
  • *
  • Posts: 219
  • Activity:
    10%
  • KARMA: 88
Re: Nataliya Kuznetsova (Trukhina) Amazonka
« Reply #331 on: November 06, 2017, 03:12:19 am »
11-4-17



At what point do you morph deniers/apologists (you know who you are) start feeling a little ridiculous?
 :tongue:

Oh, I don't know: maybe when she posts her first morph, and we fall for it?

Or: when we realise how pointless it is to discuss this with the morph conspiracy theorists?

Dude, she looks like this on her webcam, you can check for yourself any time you want.

On her instagr@m is a pic from APRIL 30, 2016. Please explain to me how 1/2 of their bodies are so much bigger than the other 1/2. Don't get me wrong, this woman is HUGE and she is by far the best fbber I've ever seen, but I will remain convinced that many of her pics are tampered with.

I also don't believe that she can bench 275lbs for 15 repetitons like she posts on JUNE 27. This would give her a max bench of 450.

Online bruce321

  • Golden VIP
  • Lurker
  • *******
  • Posts: 274
  • Activity:
    53.33%
  • KARMA: 318
Re: Nataliya Kuznetsova (Trukhina) Amazonka
« Reply #332 on: November 06, 2017, 09:02:03 am »


At what point do you morph deniers/apologists (you know who you are) start feeling a little ridiculous?
 :tongue:

Oh, I don't know: maybe when she posts her first morph, and we fall for it?

Or: when we realise how pointless it is to discuss this with the morph conspiracy theorists?

Dude, she looks like this on her webcam, you can check for yourself any time you want.

On her instagr@m is a pic from APRIL 30, 2016. Please explain to me how 1/2 of their bodies are so much bigger than the other 1/2. Don't get me wrong, this woman is HUGE and she is by far the best fbber I've ever seen, but I will remain convinced that many of her pics are tampered with.

I also don't believe that she can bench 275lbs for 15 repetitons like she posts on JUNE 27. This would give her a max bench of 450.

I assume this is the picture you're talking about? No doubt it's distorted, but I don't think it's intentional. Google pincushion distortion, and take a look at the group shot, third picture down in the article below, and read the explanation. There are grid diagrams out there that show what it does. Things in the middle appear smaller, and grow larger towards the edges, the most distortion taking place at the corners. The closest thing to the center of the picture is her left forearm, and it looks abnormally small and atrophied as you'd expect if this was occuring. If she's being shot with a crappy camera, that's going to occur. It's not your lying eyes, but it's not morphed either. It's probably happening in other women's pictures, but they aren't subject to the same scrutiny.

https://photo.stackexchange.com/questions/71938/why-dont-smartphone-cameras-correct-pincushion-distortion-automatically

Offline polchak

  • Golden VIP
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1578
  • Activity:
    100%
  • KARMA: 8022

Offline jam

  • Lurker
  • *
  • Posts: 19
  • Activity:
    0%
  • KARMA: 25

Offline n8w8

  • Lurker
  • *
  • Posts: 126
  • Activity:
    0%
  • KARMA: 487
  • Female Bodybuilding, Physique, Fitness, Figure & Bikini

Offline ravi777

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2359
  • Activity:
    100%
  • KARMA: 1874
  • Gender: Female
  • Female Bodybuilding, Physique, Fitness, Figure & Bikini
Re: Nataliya Kuznetsova (Trukhina) Amazonka
« Reply #336 on: November 08, 2017, 05:28:54 am »
 :areyouchicken:Challenging the Horizon with BBIIIIGGGG BICEPS !!!!!!!

=======+++++++ LOVE and WARM REGARDS ravi777+++++++=======
РОССИЙСКИЕ ПАРАЛИПМИЧЕСКИЕ ДЕВОЧКИ; Создайте ВАШЕ лучшее Massive Muscular BODY, и оглушите мир !!!!!!!

COME ON !!!!!!! RUSSIAN Paralympic GIRLS and Other RUSSIAN Disabled GIRLS, BUILD UP More MUSCLE, and STUN The Rest of the WORLD !!!!!!!

Offline storyillus

  • Lurker
  • *
  • Posts: 2
  • Activity:
    0%
  • KARMA: 2
  • Female Bodybuilding, Physique, Fitness, Figure & Bikini
Re: Nataliya Kuznetsova (Trukhina) Amazonka
« Reply #337 on: November 09, 2017, 03:04:48 am »
Quote

I assume this is the picture you're talking about? No doubt it's distorted, but I don't think it's intentional. Google pincushion distortion, and take a look at the group shot, third picture down in the article below, and read the explanation. There are grid diagrams out there that show what it does. Things in the middle appear smaller, and grow larger towards the edges, the most distortion taking place at the corners. The closest thing to the center of the picture is her left forearm, and it looks abnormally small and atrophied as you'd expect if this was occuring. If she's being shot with a crappy camera, that's going to occur. It's not your lying eyes, but it's not morphed either. It's probably happening in other women's pictures, but they aren't subject to the same scrutiny.

https://photo.stackexchange.com/questions/71938/why-dont-smartphone-cameras-correct-pincushion-distortion-automatically

Yes we call it a fisheye effect and all cameras have it.  A great photographer can minimize this effect, or anyone intending to do so.  That pic of her in a jewelry store, or w.e, with a denim cap and blue outfit is a classic example of the fisheye effect.  The distortion is intense because the photographer is really close to her - and that's just basic depth perception.  Also, she has high quality 720p and better videos of her posing, and she looks exactly like this.  Bobbyboy310 you should research perspective and the fisheye effect if you really want to make an educated claim.  Any fine artist will tell you the same.

Online Old Surehand

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4337
  • Activity:
    100%
  • KARMA: 35629
Re: Nataliya Kuznetsova (Trukhina) Amazonka
« Reply #338 on: November 09, 2017, 01:21:07 pm »
Quote
Bobbyboy310 you should research perspective and the fisheye effect if you really want to make an educated claim.

All bobbyboy310 did was post some of her pictures.

Offline n8w8

  • Lurker
  • *
  • Posts: 126
  • Activity:
    0%
  • KARMA: 487
  • Female Bodybuilding, Physique, Fitness, Figure & Bikini

Offline storyillus

  • Lurker
  • *
  • Posts: 2
  • Activity:
    0%
  • KARMA: 2
  • Female Bodybuilding, Physique, Fitness, Figure & Bikini
Re: Nataliya Kuznetsova (Trukhina) Amazonka
« Reply #340 on: November 09, 2017, 05:58:13 pm »
Yes I made some mistakes in that post, I usually reread my replies before I post them - sorry.  I meant to address kevin1.

frank41

  • Guest
Re: Nataliya Kuznetsova (Trukhina) Amazonka
« Reply #341 on: November 10, 2017, 03:07:05 pm »

Online Old Surehand

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4337
  • Activity:
    100%
  • KARMA: 35629
Re: Nataliya Kuznetsova (Trukhina) Amazonka
« Reply #342 on: November 11, 2017, 09:51:13 pm »

Online Old Surehand

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4337
  • Activity:
    100%
  • KARMA: 35629
Re: Nataliya Kuznetsova (Trukhina) Amazonka
« Reply #343 on: November 13, 2017, 10:40:41 pm »
11-13-2017

Looks like she's doing a video shoot.

Offline envallfan

  • Lurker
  • *
  • Posts: 21
  • Activity:
    0%
  • KARMA: 30
  • Gender: Male
  • Female Bodybuilding, Physique, Fitness, Figure & Bikini
Re: Nataliya Kuznetsova (Trukhina) Amazonka
« Reply #344 on: November 14, 2017, 08:01:25 pm »
YES - and with a proper camera and camera man!!

I have just bought the latest FitVids offering.

Again shot by Natalya's hubby. She appears to do pulldowns and rows often using the full stack - 100kg (?) = 220lbs

To increase the stack weight she puts a couple of dumbells on top of the stack. I asses they may be 20lbs each, giving 260lbs total. However the continuity of the video is RUBBISH ! She seems to place the extra weights after doing a set - then in the next set they are missing etc.

She also does some curls using weights which appear very large, first with 4 discs, then 2. No idea of the weight though!

There are also a couple of impressive side chest type poses, cut into the main video - but these seem to be filmed on an iphone, she has a job to fit herself in the narrow portrait slot!

Again the video lacks imagination - the camera is too static, and often shoots Natalya's massive shoulders against a background of black weights - not good when she is wearing black.

Natalya looks brilliant throughout, but she often wears a small towel over her neck and shoulders, so obscuring the view. Quite the teaser!

The video runs about 18 minutes so can't complain for an £11 download.

Looking forward to this next one Natalya.

Forum Saradas  |  Female BodyBuilding & Fitness & Figure - Members Area  |  Russian Female Bodybuilding & Female Bodybuilders  |  Nataliya Kuznetsova (Trukhina) Amazonka
 

gfxgfx
Forum Saradas does not host any files on its own servers.
gfx
It only points to various links on the Internet that already exist.
It is recommended to buy Original Video, CD, DVD's and pictures only.
gfx
Mobile View